#Site sucker web host free

These are broadly positive results, and show Hostinger performs better than most budget hosts. Overall, it was able to handle 15 requests per second throughout the test, a typical result for most providers. Hostinger's results showed some drops in performance at peak load, but that's what we would expect for a shared hosting package.

To do this, we use the stress-testing service k6 to unleash 20 virtual users on our site and measure what happens. One-off load speed checks are important, but we also like to see how a site performs when it's busy. It really can compete with the likes of Bluehost and HostGator. It's not significantly ahead of the competition - most providers have an LCP in the 0.60 to 0.80 area - but it suggests Hostinger isn't cutting corners to hit its low shared hosting prices. Hostinger scored here with a speedy LCP of 0.607 seconds, the second fastest result in our last 15 tests, just behind HostGator. Hostinger's performance (Image credit: Hostinger)

Some of those plans cost 5x to 10x the $1.39 you could pay with Hostinger, so on balance we think the company did reasonably well. This time the results were much better at 878ms, putting it in the top 25% of providers.Ī mixed story, then, but keep in mind these are comparisons based on the cheapest shared hosting plan from each test provider. Page load times matter too, though, so we used Dotcom Tools' Website Speed Test to measure our site performance from 16 locations around the US and Europe. Starter shared hosting plans typically manage 200-400ms with an average peak of 700-800ms, so Hostinger is clearly on the slow side when it comes to response times. recorded a response time range of 171ms to 1.73s, with an average of 382ms, over the last seven days of testing. Our test site was hosted on Hostinger's most basic shared hosting plan, but still managed a solid 100% uptime record over 10 weeks of monitoring. Hostinger plans have many features (Image credit: Hostinger) Hostinger's performanceįirst off, we used to monitor our test website from multiple locations around the world, logging response times and any downtime. It's great for beginners and maybe not the strongest option for the more traffic demanding sites. Each time we test Hostinger, it delivers quality results on overall performance, ease of use and speed. In general, Hostinger is a solid choice for those who have never used web hosting before, as well as those who have. We also go as far as utilizing Hostinger's customer support with a real issue we came across during our test. We then monitor our site's performance, including speed and uptime and have a go using all the features available in the plan. In this review, we test Hostinger by creating a functioning WordPress website and signing up to Hostinger's Premium shared plan.

#Site sucker web host free

Hostinger isn't just building its own service, though: it has developed and launched new brands and products, including web host Hosting24 and the free 000webhost.

Founded in 2004 and rated one of the best web hosting services on the market, Hostinger is an experienced Lithuanian hosting provider with 1,000+ employees and more than a million subscribers around the world.ĭatanyze' Web Hosting Market Share report ranks Hostinger in 36th place, used by around 71,000 companies, for 0.5% of the hosting market.